Good to see at least a little bit of coverage outside of the same circles. Although it isn’t positive, it also isn’t too negative. A little bit inaccurate perhaps by saying that video is permitted for personal use only. It should say for news and personal use if you want to be technical.
And I know that most people aren’t getting their news from “prowrestlingsheet” but the standards of reporting should be the same across the board. Is this an opinion piece or is it news reporting? If it’s news, then it shouldn’t say “watch the strange video below” it should say watch the video of the incident, below. Why add the opinion that this video is “strange”?
Former WWE star Val Venis had the cops called on him in Arizona this week for filming inside of a post office without permission.Val shared a video which shows him performing what people call a “First Amendment Audit” on a post office in Phoenix and the employees inside are clearly unhappy about being filmed.For those unaware, first amendment auditors typically film law enforcement or government buildings to judge the response of officers in regards to the presence of a camera. However, filming inside of a post office DOES require permission from the United States Postal Service … unless for personal use.
Source: Cops Called on Val Venis for Unauthorized Filming at Post Office (VIDEO)
